For this paper you will compare and analyze different primary Essay

For this paper you will compare and analyze different primary documents of the same topic or historical era - Essay exerciseII. An Old Whig An article published in The Massachusetts Gazette on November 27, 1787 questioned whether or not the proposed constitution was rushed (AntiFederalist text file No. 1-85). This article write by and titled An Old Whig pointed out that the constitution itself would require that every state in the union revise its existing laws so that those laws are conformable with the US Constitution. It therefore makes sense that the proposed constitution be revised and debated to ensure that it does accomplish that which it sets out to accomplish the formation of a great republic (AntiFederalist cover No. 1-85). The article expressed fear that the proposed constitution was rushed primarily because the public demanded its passage. However, in rushing the proposed constitution, it was important not to lose sight of the dangers of move too much power over the entire domain of the country into the hands of so few. Such a constitution must carefully pick out the fundamental freedoms of the people and methods by which to safeguard against the abuse of powers by so few over the majority. Therefore it is important that the proposed constitution be revised and accompany by a carefully drafted Bill of Rights otherwise, the proposed constitution could eventually turn the US into a monarchy (AntiFederalist Papers No. 1-85). III. ... Unlike An Old Whig, the Philanthorpos provided specific examples of wherefore the new constitution as it was threatened liberties and challenged the formation of a great Republic. For example the new constitution confers upon Congress the power to regulate commerce further does not give Congress the authority to borrow money. Moreover, Congress will have the power to appoint members of the judiciary and can exercise that power for altruistic reasons (AntiFederalist Papers No. 1-85). Philanthorpos like An Old Whig predicted that the new constitution would lead to unstable and autonomous rule. While An Old Whig predicted the formation of a monarchy, Philanthorpos predicted the formation of a tyranny and despotism (AntiFederalist Papers No. 1-85). The rich and powerful will fight to retain power and the poor will struggle to gain some measure of power and improvement in their lives. The likely outcome would therefore be a civil war (AntiFederalist Papers No. 1-85). Therefore the predictions do by Philanthorpos were far more devastating than those made by An Old Whig. The latter article merely called for a careful reframing and revision of the proposed constitution and the designer expressed the belief that it was a downgrade on the previous constitution and would, if presented as it stood lead to political unrest, divisions among the people, autonomy and eventually civil war. IV. capital of Wisconsin The Federalist Papers unlike the Anti-federalist papers supported the new constitution and were written by Jon Jay, Alexander Hamilton and James Madison between late 1787 and May 1788. James Madisons The Union as a Safeguard Against Domestic Faction and Insurrection, took an entirely different view of the Philanthorpos and An Old Whig